Thanks to Jim Burdge for send in this article:

DECLASSIFIED

5th 175mm Gun Battery (SP) (REIN)

Fleet Marine Force Pacific

FPO San Francisco, California 96602

BtryO 5060.1 JWL/wrm

27 Feb 1970

BATTERY ORDER 5060.1

FROM: Commanding Officer

To: All Hands

Subj: Battery Combat History

1. Purpose. To publish the combat history of 5th 175mm Gun Battery (SP) REIN in the Republic of Vietnam.

2. The combat history of 5th 175mm Gun Battery in Vietnam is a short but proud one.

The battery was activated on 1 August 1966 at Marine Corps Base, Twenty-Nine Palms, California as the 5th 155mm Gun Battery, On 23 July 1967, two platoons of 155mm Guns and one platoon of 8 Inch Howitzers came ashore at Chu Lai in the southern part of I Corps Tactical Zone. During the remainder of 1967, the battery operated primarily in the area around Chu Lai and DaNang, but began moving North near the year's end. By December 1967, the battery was spread the entire length of I Corps,from Chu Lai in the South, to Dong Ha in the North.1968 found 5th Guns operating throughout Northern "L Corps. Cam Lo, Ca Lu, the Rockpile and Khe Sanh became well known positions to the Guns. One position,occupied from July to December 1968 was finally closed out, only to be reopened again with the help of 5th Guns a year later, this being Camp J.J.CARROLL.

In March of 1969, the first of the new 175mm Guns were received. The first round of the new weapon was fired by the Commanding General of the 3d Marine Division. By April, the entire battery had acquired the new 175's and on 29 April 1969 the unit was officially re-designated 5th 175mm Gun Battery (SP) (REIN). Early 1969 found the battery occupying Vandergrift Combat Base, Fire Support Base Elliott, and Dong Ha West. In October, the six 175mm Guns moved into the newly reopened Camp Carroll, while the 8 Inch Howitzer Platoon went north to FSB Alpha-2 on the DMZ. At this time, 5th Guns began a unique and rewarding relationship with the United States Army. While our parent unit remained the 11th Marine Regiment of 1st Marine Division, operational control was passed to the 108th Artillery Group of XXIV Corps Artillery. During the next four and one-half months, 5th Guns participated in some of its most challenging operations. While working with 108th Group, the battery fired over 26,000 rounds,more than 6,000 rounds per month and participated in three heavy artillery raids.

During it's tour in Vietnam, 5th 175mm Gun Battery participated in a total of 32 separate combat operations, while only losing five men to the enemy. As a 175mm Gun Battery for only 11 months, 5th Guns expended over 45,000 rounds of heavy artillery against the enemy forces in Northern I Corps. While 5th 175mm Gun Battery spent only two and one-half years in Vietnam, it operated the entire length and breadth of I Corps, from Chu Lai in the South to Gio Linh in the North and West to Khe Sanh.It's combat history ranks as one of the finest and is a credit to the Marines who served with the battery and to our beloved Corps.

JAMES C. ATKINS JR.

Major, U. S. Marine Corps

Commanding

DISTRIBUTION: "B"

 

Activated in August 1966 as a 155mm gun battery, this unit had been in Vietnam since July 1967, initially near Chu Lai and Da Nang and in Northern ICTZ since the beginning of 1968. In March 1969, it had received its 175mm guns, and in October of the same year, as the 3rd Marine Division redeployed, it came under operational control of XXIV Corps, attached to the 108th Artillery Group. 5th 175mm Gun Battery. 

 

The single Marine artillery unit not under 11th Marines control, the 5th 175mm Gun Battery (SP) (Rein), operated in northern I Corps. Its command post was at Dong Ha Combat Base, while its 175mm guns were at Camp Carroll and a reinforcing platoon of 8-inch self-propelled howitzers was located at FSB A-2. This battery, under the operational control of the 108th Artillery Group, USA, fired long-range missions in support of the 101st Airborne Division; the 1st Brigade, 5th Infantry Division (Mechanized); and the 1st ARVN Division. It also attacked targets in enemy base areas along the Laotian border. The battery's tracked 175's periodically moved west along Route 9 to participate in Army artillery raids on enemy bases not in range from American positions.

Subject:

Vietnam Perspective by Retired Lt.  Gen.  James Link, U.S.  Army, former

commander of Redstone Arsenal, delivered this address at the breakfast

commemorating the arrival in Huntsville, Alabama of the traveling

Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests, fellow veterans, and especially fellow veterans of the war in Vietnam.  It is indeed a tremendous honor for me to stand before you this morning as we come together to remember fallen comrades, MIAs/POWs and a very important time in our lives.  A time of war, a time of conflict not only in Southeast Asia, but throughout our nation.  Indeed a time that has shaped our national consciousness, and for we veterans, a time which forged a sense of self that in many ways defines us still today.  Lest we forget, how then do we remember?  How do we honor those who did not come home, or came home broken and bent in both body and spirit?  I remember when the architectural design of the Vietnam War Memorial Wall was first proposed.  Many of us recoiled at the thought of a ditch on the Mall, listing nothing more than the names of those who paid the ultimate sacrifice.  Surely, this was yet one more insult hurled at those who had answered the call to serve their nation rather than serve themselves.  But that wall has transcended all things political and overcome controversy, as it reaches out to us who served, and even those who did not serve, while deeply touching all of us who lost comrades, friends, neighbors and loved ones during that troubled time.  The mystery of the wall is found in its majestic simplicity.  Panels of black stone that hold not only the names of those killed, but in its mirror-like finish, the faces of all of us who come to witness its solemn statement.  In that reflection, we are made one with the monument, we join its essence, and are consumed by images behind the names.  Images of young men, their lives cut short, their personal sacrifices often unrecorded, their selfless service, unflinching courage, and the unique love and caring that is shared by comrades in arms.  It is the wound on our National Mall that never heals, but it does serve to soothe the deep scars on those of us who carry heavy memories, and for some perhaps a little guilt for having been the ones fortunate enough to return to "the world." As this Memorial travels around the country it invariably brings with it a lot of discussion and perhaps even rekindled old arguments about the Vietnam War.  The arrival of the Vietnam Memorial Wall in Huntsville provides an opportunity for us to reflect on this important period in our individual lives and our nation's history.  Of course, there are those who might say we veterans are still too close to the heat of battle, too burdened by personal experiences to make objective judgments about the Vietnam War.  To that, I say Bull!  I've grown weary of those in the media, academia and the entertainment industry, who would purport to speak for us, or to try to define us a bunch of hair-trigger psychopaths on the verge of insanity or some unspeakable violence.  We who were actually there know what we saw, and we know what we did.  Each of us is just one of the millions who proudly served, having done our duty with honor.  I see little of what I experienced reflected in Oliver Stone's movies.  I personally think Oliver donated a few too many of his brain cells to his drug use. In my view, movies like "Apocalypse Now" are nothing more than a collection of psychotic experiences made up in Hollywood bearing scant resemblance to the reality we experienced.  You and I can certainly recognize the difference between artistic license and a lie, can't we! America's involvement in Vietnam lasted for thirteen years, from 1960 to 1973.  Of course the result was not victory at all.  Not even a cease-fire or a demilitarized strip of land between North and South as happened in Korea.  Just negotiated terms allowing the United States of America to "withdraw with honor." Whatever that meant.  So we didn't return home to victory parades and kisses in Times Square.  Most of us were just another passenger aboard a chartered airliner (mine was a Braniff Airlines Boeing 707) painted a heinous green color.  What a beautiful sight!  Others came home in Air Force cargo planes to be dumped at some military base usually in the middle of the night. Remember, we came home to antipathy and in many cases to antagonism.  We were told to quickly get out of our uniforms in order to avoid confrontations on city streets.  No wonder it has taken so long for many of us to even want to talk about the war.  But talk we must for we are living witnesses, and if we are silent others will continue to spin a version of the truth that best suits their personal agenda.  We must dispel the myths that have grown up around the War, and there are so many.  Those of us who served must debunk these myths at every opportunity, and today is one of those.  The first myth is that the armed forces of the United States suffered a major military defeat in Vietnam.  Our forces were never defeated in terrible battles where our soldiers and Marines suffered awful casualties, like Dak To and Hamburger Hill, and our airmen suffered too, many killed and captured in the air campaign, but the war was not lost as a result of these battles.  In fact, where we found the enemy we defeated him.  After the Tet Offensive in 1968, the Vietcong and the North Vietnamese operating in the south, were so soundly defeated that they could not launch another major offensive until 1972.  That didn't deter the North Vietnamese, since they were willing to lose the war on the battlefield, they were after victory in the minds of the American people.  Perhaps we could have won a military victory, but it would have taken many more than the 500,000 troops we had in Vietnam at the height of the war. Besides, by 1969, public opinion in the United States wanted us out of Vietnam.  The role of the media in deciding this issue has been the subject of many books and articles, so I won't go into that here.  I will say I don't believe the media caused us to lose the war, although some in the press were trying their best to make it so.  Those of you who attended the AUSA Conference in Washington this year will recall General Weyand's remarks while accepting the George C.  Marshall Award. Following Tet 1968, he was interviewed by Walter Cronkite in the Mekong Delta following the resounding defeat of enemy forces there by the U.S. military, including U.S.  Navy Riverine Forces.  Walter acknowledged the victory, but told General Weyand he preferred to report on the thousands of Vietnamese he had seen being put in mass graves in Hue after Tet.  In reporting this rather than any American victory, he said he hoped to bring a quicker end to the war.  It didn't seem to bother Mr.  Cronkite that the bodies were those of South Vietnamese brutally killed by the North Vietnamese during Tet.  Nor did it seem to bother him that he had compromised his own objectivity and integrity in reporting the war.  Of course, we who have dedicated our lives defending the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic certainly support all its provisions to include the First Amendment.  I just hope what we saw in the press in Vietnam and still see today isn't as good as it gets.  Our nation deserves better.  The second myth is that somehow the soldiers in Vietnam were very different from those who served in World War II.  The myth purports that the Vietnam soldier was much younger, poorly educated, forced to go to war against his will.  It is often claimed that they disproportionately came from minority groups, while their better-off social superiors dodged the draft and stayed safe at home out of harm's way.  The truth is, of course, different.  The average age of the soldiers in Vietnam was just under 23 compared to around 25 in World War II where mass conscription prevailed.  The enlisted soldier in Vietnam was actually better educated: 79 percent had completed high school as opposed to just 24 percent in World War II.  In Vietnam, 20 percent of the enlisted men had college degrees, three times the number in the Second World War.  In a democracy, even your jeep driver may be better educated than you.  As far as social representation, studies have shown that blacks and Hispanics were actually slightly underrepresented compared to their percentage of the total population.  For instance, African-Americans comprised 13.1 percent of the age group subject to the military, they comprised 12.6 percent of the armed forces, and represented 12.2 percent of the casualties.  In 1992 a study looked at the 58,000 Americans killed in Vietnam and found that 30 percent came from families in the lowest third of the income range while 26 percent came from the highest.  Not much of a disparity when you look at the facts.  A third myth is that draft evasion was rampant during the Vietnam era and higher than in World War II.  Not so.  During the Vietnam War about half a million men were draft dodgers, and I bet you know some of their names!  Only about 9,000 cases were actually prosecuted, and very few ever served prison time.  In World War II, 350,000 were prosecuted for draft evasion and many went to prison.  It is interesting to note that during Vietnam 10,000 Americans went to Canada, but up to 30,000 Canadians joined the U.S.  armed forces, and of

those 10,000 served in Vietnam.  We all know cowardice in the face of the draft is not a new phenomenon, but during Vietnam it became an art form.  More importantly, draft dodgers made themselves out to be ethical and moral, while those of us who served were made out to be morally inferior, stupid, or just unlucky.  The radical left on our campuses had a clear goal of transforming the shame of the self-serving and the fearful into the guilt of the courageous.  A fourth myth is that casualties were disproportionately higher for enlisted men than for officers.  Actually, while officers killed in action accounted for 13.5 percent of those who died in Vietnam, they comprised only 12 percent of the troop strength. Proportionally, more officers were killed in Vietnam than in World War II.  In Vietnam, we lost twice as many company commanders as we did platoon leaders, confirming in the Vietnam War that leaders led from the front.  Another interesting fact you can use to debunk a popular myth is that volunteers, not draftees, accounted for the majority (77 percent) of combat deaths in Vietnam.  How many of those do you think were 18 year olds?  Just 101, or less than one tenth of one percent of all those

killed.

 

Well, there are many other myths we could talk about, but instead I'd like to remind you of the humor that accompanied American soldiers in this war, as it has all the others.  I suspect many of you remember the time honored Murphy's Laws of Combat: * Don't look conspicuous .  .  .  it draws fire.  * If it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.  * If your attack is going really well, it's an ambush.  * When you have secured an area, don't forget to tell the enemy.  * Friendly fire .  .  .  isn't.  * Anything you do can get you shot, including doing nothing.  * Never share a foxhole with someone braver than you are.  * A sucking chest wound is just nature's way of telling you to slow down.  * The buddy system is key to your survival .  .  .  it gives the enemy someone else to shoot at.  * It's not the one with your name on it you need to worry about, it's the one addressed: "To whom it may concern." 

Remember, nine million men and women served in the military during the 13 years of the war, and three million of those served in the Vietnam theater.  Two thirds of those who saw duty in Vietnam were volunteers and 77 percent of those who died were volunteers.  Our American citizen-soldier performed with a tenacity and quality that may never be fully appreciated or truly understood.  Should anyone think the war was conducted in an incompetent manner, should look at the numbers: Hanoi admits to 1.4 million of its soldiers killed on the battlefield compared to our 58,000, and about 250,000 South Vietnamese.  And if someone tries to convince you that Vietnam was "a dirty little war", where Air Force and Navy bombs did all the work, you might remind them that this was the most costly war the grunts of the U.S.  Marines Corps ever fought-five times as many dead as in World War I, three times as many dead as in Korea, and more total killed and wounded than in all of World War II. To the Vietnam veterans here today, and to all those whose name appears on the Wall, I say you are all heroes.  Heroes who faced the issues of this war, including your own possible death, and after weighing those concerns against your obligation to your country, you decided to serve with honor.  In the words of a timeless phrase found on the Confederate Memorial in Arlington Cemetery, "not for fame or reward, not for place or for rank, but in simple obedience to duty, as they understood it." I ask each of you to treat each other with the dignity and respect you have earned.  Reach out and welcome a fellow Vietnam veteran home.  God bless each of you, and may God continue to bless this America we love and serve.